<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Phishing on Daily DMARC News</title><link>https://news.excello.email/tags/phishing/</link><description>Recent content in Phishing on Daily DMARC News</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://news.excello.email/tags/phishing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The 2026 DMARC Enforcement Gap: Why Having a Record Is Not Enough</title><link>https://news.excello.email/posts/2026-05-18-dmarc-enforcement-gap/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://news.excello.email/posts/2026-05-18-dmarc-enforcement-gap/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A wave of new industry data published this spring lands a single, urgent message: &lt;strong&gt;most organizations have done just enough to avoid getting blocked by Gmail and Outlook — and absolutely nothing to stop attackers from impersonating their domains.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two major reports — EasyDMARC&amp;rsquo;s 2026 DMARC Adoption &amp;amp; Enforcement Report and Valimail&amp;rsquo;s 2026 State of DMARC Report — put hard numbers to a gap that security teams have warned about for years. The gap between &amp;ldquo;having DMARC&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;being protected by DMARC&amp;rdquo; has never been wider, and the threat landscape has never made closing it more urgent.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>